Mondaq USA: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Trials & Appeals & Compensation
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
The Georgia Supreme Court is reaching the end of its April Term. This means that cases submitted to the Court during the December Term that have not yet been decided will be decided in the next few weeks.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
We have been following this developing issue for some time.
Ropes & Gray LLP
In this podcast, intellectual property litigation partner Leslie Spencer and associate Marta Belcher address such topics as:
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
In Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Nos. 2016-2707, 2016-2708 (Fed. Cir. April 13, 2018), the court held that claims to methods of treatment were patent eligible.
Carlton Fields
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court order denying certification to a group of homeowners in four states who alleged roof shingle manufacturer Owens Corning ...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The Ninth Circuit has established a legal framework for courts to use when determining whether to enjoin litigants from enforcing injunctions ordered by courts in other countries.
Archer & Greiner P.C.
Trial attorneys prepare for issues they expect will arise.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
On May 14, 2018, in Anacor v. Iancu, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion affirming the Board's invalidation of Anacor's tavaborole patent. The patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 7,582,621 ...
Reed Smith
The taxpayer at issue ("Taxpayer") was a corporate subsidiary of MCI, Inc. ("MCI"). For federal income tax purposes, Taxpayer filed as part of the MCI consolidated group.
Ropes & Gray LLP
While most remember the Cuozzo appeal as challenging the Patent Trial & Appeal Board's (PTAB) claim construction practices ...
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
The Martin Act is one of the most powerful tools in the attorney general's regulatory arsenal because, unlike similar causes of action, it does not require scienter, or intent to defraud.
RPX Corporation
The cases against the other three continue, as do the cases filed in October against AT&T, Deutsche Telekom, SoftBank Group (Sprint), and Verizon.
Ropes & Gray LLP
April 2018, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in SAS Institute. As a result, petitioners and patent owners needed to immediately grapple with significant practice changes.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
In a recent case, Lewis Brisbois successfully moved a federal court to compel arbitration of all of a contractor's claims against an engineering firm and to preclude an interlocutory appeal of the ruling.
Miller Friel
Insurance Coverage litigation may be, by some, considered a last resort. That is, a process to enter into when all other avenues of settlement have failed. In certain situations, however, insurers file early declaratory judgment actions.
Foley & Lardner
In a quartet of recent decisions, the Federal Circuit has confirmed that SAS Institute extends beyond mandating the inclusion of all claims when trial is instituted, and extends to all grounds as well.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
On Thursday June 14, 2018, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled against two health plans seeking risk corridors payments from the federal government.
Foley & Lardner
On June 13, 2018, Sen. Hatch (R-Utah) introduced an amendment that would require generic ANDA filers to choose ...
Proskauer Rose LLP
The Supreme Court ruled today that, when a foreign government presents a formal submission to a federal court about the content of the government's own laws, the court should accord "respectful consideration" to the government's statements, but is not bound to grant them "conclusive effect."
Mayer Brown
Recently, the Ninth Circuit held that only negligence, not scienter, is required to be shown where a violation of the tender offer provisions of Section 14(e) is alleged.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Foley Hoag LLP
Possibly foreshadowing the Supreme Court's decision on a petition for certiorari we recently chronicled here...
Holland & Knight
While financial recoveries under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) continued at a fast pace last year, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) started 2018 ...
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
In January 2018, the Ninth Circuit in Batterton v. Dutra Group affirmed the lower court's decision ruling that punitive damages are awardable to seamen in unseaworthiness actions.
Foley & Lardner
Seventh Circuit Rule 30(a) requires an appellant to "append to [its] opening brief[] the judgment under review and its adjoining findings of fact and conclusions of law."
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
A California jury recently awarded Apple $538.6 million in total damages for patent infringement by Samsung.
McDermott Will & Emery
Addressing the issue of federal jurisdiction based on a lack of Art. III standing by plaintiff, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ...
McDermott Will & Emery
On April 9, 2018, the New York State Supreme Court granted Starbucks' motion to dismiss claims that it had failed to collect more than $10 million of sales tax at its New York stores.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Medtronic argued that it does not lease or own any locations in the district.
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
This decision reflects continued deference by the California courts to Delaware forum selection clauses in certificates of incorporation.
Duff and Phelps
For state and local governments and brick-and-mortar retailers alike, it's been a long time coming. On April 17, 2018, they finally had their day in court.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with